Jack, in my experience when editors involved in a case doesn't see it going
the way they want, they almost inevitably claim that one or more of the
arbitrators is biased against them, based on some long-standing (but
undocumented) hatred for them. It's not quite as common for them to claim
there is a vast community consensus supporting their viewpoint - I give you
credit for having the chutzpah to do the latter.
Regards,
Jay.
From: Sam Spade
<samspade.thomasjefferson(a)googlemail.com>
I am making a very specific accusation: Due to a long history of
conflict with myself, JAYJG has no ability to be neutral in this case.
His lack of recusal is far more striking than that of Fred Bauder.
Both of them, along w other obvious concerns (Kelly Martin) makes this
case a very bad precedent regarding recusals.
Sam Spade
On 12/5/05, JAY JG <jayjg(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
No, Fred, he's making a much broader
accusation; in fact a series of
broad
accusations unsupported by any evidence.
Jay.
>From: Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net>
>
>He is referring to my disclosure that I may have briefly encountered
Chip
>Berlet when I was in the National Lawyers
Guild. I did not recuse on
that
>basis as there was very little if any actual
connection between us. I
>don't think membership or even active participation in the National
>Lawyers Guild forms a basis for recusal as there are a number of
reasons
>why people join the National Lawyers Guild
and participate in it.
Other
>than involvement in legal work there is
absolutely no test for
membership.
>Successful participation is another story. I
soon found out that since
I
>did not support the Gang of Four I was
considered chopped liver.
>
>Fred
>
>On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:57 AM, JAY JG wrote:
>
>>Please don't try to re-direct the questions, Jack, and please don't
try
>>to make them about me. You made
insinuations about the Arbitration
>>Committee, please clarify. I'll repeat the questions:
>>
>>1. Do you think that the Committee is trying to "purge right wingers"?
>>2. Do you imagine that there are no "right wingers" on the Committee
>>itself?
>>3. Why would you insinuate that Cberlet is any more the "friend and
>>colleague" of members of the Arbitration Committee than are any of
the
other parties to the case?
Jay.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l