In real life such "flunkies" are called lawyers, on Wikipedia Advocates. We could require advocates. However our experience with advocates is that they pay no attention to presenting evidence, a real lawyers actual function, but engage in weird Wikilawyering that harms their clients cause. Challenging our jurisdiction and demanding that we all recuse ourselves is not going to work.
Fred
On Jul 12, 2005, at 7:27 AM, Phil Boswell wrote:
"Fred Bauder" fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote in message news:B845F36D-E8A8-4C7C-B5F1-A683CE6FAC55@ctelco.net...
We have restricted the amount that can be presented. But what is really needed is better organized evidence. Most time and energy expended by Arbitrators goes into trying to figure out what is significant.
Many is the time when I've tried to puzzle out badly-formatted evidence and my editing fingers have been itching to re-format into some sort of readable state, but there's this notice which says not to.
Maybe the ArbCom could "employ" some flunkies to janitorise the evidence and wrangle it into a standard, readable, format. -- Phil [[en:User:Phil Boswell]]
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l