Phil Boswell (phil.boswell(a)gmail.com) [050713 00:41]:
"Kelly Martin"
<kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com>
wrote in message news:bd4c411e05071206555cdd1908@mail.gmail.com...
> On 7/12/05, Phil Boswell
> <phil.boswell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe the ArbCom could "employ"
some flunkies to janitorise the evidence
> > and
> > wrangle it into a standard, readable, format.
> The idea of the ArbCom having a "special
master" corral the evidence
> into good order is a good one, but the problem is in finding people to
> do that. Finding people who are willing to do such tedious work
> without compensation and also disinterested in the matter _sub judice_
> is very difficult -- even harder than finding good arbitrators.
Then you want someone like me, but with more regular
access and more spare
time, who could give less than two hoots about who's involved but will
happily wrangle data into a nicer shape because it hurts less to look at.
Heh - the volunteer efforts of people who like things ordered :-)
It will be of course *very* important not to tread on the toes of the
people who presented the evidence, if you're not presenting it on your own
behalf.
Happily I have never yet been involved in anything
like this, but IMNSHO
almost the worst aspect is just how painful it is to try to figure out what
happened when.
Um, yes.
- d.