"Guy Chapman aka JzG" wrote
The fundamental problem in my view is that some people
think their
right to free speech somehow trumps policy, and that policy should not
in any case be interpreted to include how users interact with each
other.
I've not actually read a fundamental analysis that I have found convincing;
and some of the things being written here strike me as back to front.
Can one actually draw a line betweeen bumper-sticker-sans-vehicle loudmouth
talk (e.g. annoying userbox I saw about intolerance of Commonwealth
English), and identity politics, which at worst is highly divisive and at
best puts partisan editing further up the agenda than it needs to be? It's
tricky to do so.. And yet there is an inverse proportion going on, where it
is arguable (in the real world) that it is more important to have the right
of self-declaration and mutual recognition.
The fundamental problem we know about is that there is a real world,
off-wiki, and it keeps on intruding. Because WP is now media as well as
'pedia, its content affects the real world, implying a responsibility. It
is a bit odd that the 'defining issue', since the January elections, is not
to do with article content. I suppose if it were, we'd be worse off, since
no one wants to see central control of article content.
Charles