There is no difference in attribution to a vanished user than there is to
any other user who has an account. I don't understand why anyone would
think otherwise.
Risker
On 17 August 2015 at 16:20, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 16:04, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Currently our default license for EN wiki is CC
BY-SA 3.0, but isn't
this a
bit odd for IP editors and vanished users?
Wouldn't it make more sense if
IP editors were licensing their edits as CC SA, and vanishing users as
part
of vanishing were relicensing their edits as
CC-SA?
The CC-SA license doesn't exist ;-) Presumably you meant CC-0. I'd
agree with Oliver that changing this would probably be more complexity
than it's worth.
The vanishing users thing is also a bit concerning. I agree that
attributing something to "anon-655345" is a bit silly, but equally I
don't think we can practically insist that a vanishing user is
required to relinquish their copyrights before we let them vanish.
A.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l