On 30/04/07, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
- Do we know of the relationships (including fiscal) of all people with
authority to decide the nofollow situation to the website in question?
That would be the meta admins. If you have a reasonable claim to make of financial impropriety on the part of any of them in editing the interwiki map, you should really make a clear claim rather than an allusion of a possibility.
(Compare, e.g. allusions that en:wp admins *might* be working to benefit Wikia. They sure might. But you'll need more than an allusion to be taken seriously.)
- Do we know the relationshp of the Foundation to all such sites that are on
the Interwiki link?
It would probably merely be a matter of going through the list.
The problem in a Nutshell: As Anthony just said, "I think the best argument for this is that enforcing a double-standard which benefits the for-profit business of the founder of Wikimedia and a board member *looks bad*."
Go wild.
- d.