On 4/20/07, Cascadia <cascadia(a)privatenoc.com> wrote:
My thoughts of the language that would appear are as
follows:
"By and large, administrators and editors are responsible for all actions on
Wikipedia that may involve legal action. Most administrative actions on
Wikipedia should not fall under any existing laws. However, should an admin
be summoned to a court of law under a suit alledging illegal action as part
of an administrative act, the Foundation will assist the admin to the point
of asserting that the Foundation controls the content on all sites under
their jurisdiction, and that the admin is an appointed delegate of the
Foundation and is generally free to carry out those orders as they see fit.
Oh Boy, it's Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy all over again. Don't go there.