On 4/20/07, Cascadia cascadia@privatenoc.com wrote:
My thoughts of the language that would appear are as follows:
"By and large, administrators and editors are responsible for all actions on Wikipedia that may involve legal action. Most administrative actions on Wikipedia should not fall under any existing laws. However, should an admin be summoned to a court of law under a suit alledging illegal action as part of an administrative act, the Foundation will assist the admin to the point of asserting that the Foundation controls the content on all sites under their jurisdiction, and that the admin is an appointed delegate of the Foundation and is generally free to carry out those orders as they see fit.
Oh Boy, it's Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy all over again. Don't go there.