Lilliputian nationalist form a network and come over to Wikipedia, turning
the article about Blefuscu into a travesty. A lone Blefuscu native sees the
imbalance and tries to address it, engaging in mediation and eventually
arbitration. Afterward the Lilliputians successfully get the Blefuscuan
topic banned because the Blefuscuan isn't adding to the imbalance of
negative information about his own country.
Interesting.
-Durova
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, stevertigo <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, SlimVirgin
<slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is the key point, I think. We don't have an absolute definition
of neutrality. We don't even have a "I know it when I see it" kind of
system. Neutrality -- everywhere -- is a work in progress. Now,
That's exactly right. All this group would be
looking for are good-faith
efforts to edit in accordance with the NPOV policy. It's not an attempt
to
control content, but behaviour. Perhaps we should
change the title to
reflect that.
You lost me. If you say its all about the content, I'd be on board. You say
its about "behaviour[-alism]," and I go now elsewhere to let you rethink
the
idea entirely.
-SV
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l