On 6/7/07, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com> wrote:
FAC is a time-consuming process, and it requires a lot
of concentrated
work on the part of various editors. Things slip through that
shouldn't. This obviously shouldn't have. Also, FAR is a
time-consuming process. Maybe acting unilaterally and just removing
it was a good thing.
I don't think it's that it accidentally slipped through; rather, it
slipped through because FAC explicitly does not make value judgments
on the suitability of a subject. Non-actionable objections may be
ignored, after all, and 'Get a better subject matter' is not
actionable.
-Matt