On 6/7/07, K P kpbotany@gmail.com wrote:
FAC is a time-consuming process, and it requires a lot of concentrated work on the part of various editors. Things slip through that shouldn't. This obviously shouldn't have. Also, FAR is a time-consuming process. Maybe acting unilaterally and just removing it was a good thing.
I don't think it's that it accidentally slipped through; rather, it slipped through because FAC explicitly does not make value judgments on the suitability of a subject. Non-actionable objections may be ignored, after all, and 'Get a better subject matter' is not actionable.
-Matt