-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
Perhaps that's true, but there seems to be a
general disagreement when
something is verifiable, original research or NPOV to begin with. I
consider a minor band that doesn't pass WP:MUSIC as vanity which is
essentially a sort of POV that says, I'm important enough for an
encyclopedia even though I haven't released any singles or albums yet.
Others claim, as noted, that they're verifiable, non-original research
and NPOV because the article doesn't promote them. I think the mere
fact of putting something on a high-profile site as Wikipedia could be
seen as an attempt of promotion. -
I would have thought that WP:MUSIC was a breakdown of how WP:NOR works
wrt. musical groups...
Of course, writing an article about your own band kinda breaks NPOV
anyway, doesn't it? Well, NPOV is always available from Carlos behind
the 7-11 :)
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQz9u07MAAH8MeUlWAQjhcAf/eyzH4LCHHVBi/9hf0ejHMDNKecO3855T
avwAtFY1k9XrFz+xTuGXXPfn3iFXcgU9lIviPKpoRjmQmiixDVa0F8aQNxPmXVvG
pXpQKhWEUKe/cBp4sSJGTMUs+LJURTqXbiaAdSxu87+WePLisxHK0030tbF/k9p4
2UahosQW7gZlpTntdMyAaT37G58Sz5eFjkkxzxZ6J2cnhu/Mc55WdTYCocrPLZ7l
SPV2I8LGWOWSCSaYoK9tvgCgTa91mdjrOdkAm7vQWoYhnKpiZtSJ6nvIo3rrvpCk
nX9U77+0HgUPDXR5C83HyZEgutvDSi8NUzDAQ4EMxw18YQafps7yQg==
=SEij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----