If we're going to start playing the personal attack game, go fellate
yourself.
If any reasonably neutral user where to look over the facts of my case,
they would clearly see that I was initially a good-faith editor, but
turned sour after enduring horrendous personal attacks from you, your
friend "Sarah", and others. I was accused of being an anti-Semite, a
neo-Nazi, a neo-Nazi sympathizer, and other unpleasantries. I had to
deal with massive assumptions of bad faith until I eventually fired
back. What was my crime to begin with? I was an administrator on an
unpopular webforum and refused to bend to the whims of certain Wikipedia
contributors in the way I ran it. Thus, I was targeted, smeared, and
eventually banned as a "disruptive troll".
And to those ignorant of how I ran the webforum, I took great pains to
ensure that problematic content would stay out of search engines. First,
I created a members-only subforum for users who wanted to vent personal
attacks, and later, after the incident with Katefan0, I modified the
board settings so that the "editors" forum would also stay out of search
engines. Now, I'll admit that these steps were not entirely sufficient,
but I can also say, and honestly, that I have done more than Wikipedia
has done to protect people's privacy and their right not to have libel
about them spread around the internet.
You cannot take any moral high ground, Jay.
jayjg wrote:
Consider the source.