If we're going to start playing the personal attack game, go fellate yourself.
If any reasonably neutral user where to look over the facts of my case, they would clearly see that I was initially a good-faith editor, but turned sour after enduring horrendous personal attacks from you, your friend "Sarah", and others. I was accused of being an anti-Semite, a neo-Nazi, a neo-Nazi sympathizer, and other unpleasantries. I had to deal with massive assumptions of bad faith until I eventually fired back. What was my crime to begin with? I was an administrator on an unpopular webforum and refused to bend to the whims of certain Wikipedia contributors in the way I ran it. Thus, I was targeted, smeared, and eventually banned as a "disruptive troll".
And to those ignorant of how I ran the webforum, I took great pains to ensure that problematic content would stay out of search engines. First, I created a members-only subforum for users who wanted to vent personal attacks, and later, after the incident with Katefan0, I modified the board settings so that the "editors" forum would also stay out of search engines. Now, I'll admit that these steps were not entirely sufficient, but I can also say, and honestly, that I have done more than Wikipedia has done to protect people's privacy and their right not to have libel about them spread around the internet.
You cannot take any moral high ground, Jay.
jayjg wrote:
Consider the source.