On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:29:25 -0700, "Matthew Brown" <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Several is a long, long way from consensus, that's
for sure. There's
a reasonable argument of how far we should dig to find a date of birth
if one is not readily accessible, which goes into original research as
well as invasion of privacy, but if a date of birth is readily
obtainable, I see no reason not to place it in the article.
I didn't say it was right, I didn't say it was consensus, I merely
pointed out that there was more to it than the complainant had
revealed.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG