On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:29:25 -0700, "Matthew Brown" morven@gmail.com wrote:
Several is a long, long way from consensus, that's for sure. There's a reasonable argument of how far we should dig to find a date of birth if one is not readily accessible, which goes into original research as well as invasion of privacy, but if a date of birth is readily obtainable, I see no reason not to place it in the article.
I didn't say it was right, I didn't say it was consensus, I merely pointed out that there was more to it than the complainant had revealed.
Guy (JzG)