On 9 May 2011 09:56, K. Peachey <p858snake(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I suspect that the remaining users of the classic
skin do not
> constitute an obvious and overwhelming veto.
> I also suspect that anyone that interested in the classic skin is
> going to have to submit patches themselves.
Since the official [foundation] standard is 1% before
they get axed
for web browser support, I believe skin usage should be considered the
same in regards to its supportedness.
That's roughly what I said. Functionality in Classic was getting flaky
*years* ago, which is why I moved to Monobook (and am now very happy
with Vector).
Of course, that's no reason to *refuse* patches for little-used skins
or browsers.
- d.