On 9 May 2011 09:56, K. Peachey p858snake@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that the remaining users of the classic skin do not constitute an obvious and overwhelming veto. I also suspect that anyone that interested in the classic skin is going to have to submit patches themselves.
Since the official [foundation] standard is 1% before they get axed for web browser support, I believe skin usage should be considered the same in regards to its supportedness.
That's roughly what I said. Functionality in Classic was getting flaky *years* ago, which is why I moved to Monobook (and am now very happy with Vector).
Of course, that's no reason to *refuse* patches for little-used skins or browsers.
- d.