On 21/10/2007, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/10/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
On 10/21/07, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/10/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
Anyway, for all I know they've already gotten
permission. Who would
be the one to contact about this?
No idea. But they don't need permission; they are under no legal or
moral or ethical obligation to ask for it;
Wow, I'm rather surprised by that. Ohwell.
I'm not sure I understand what the problem is here. A book has been
published about how to contribute to Wikipedia and some are worrying
about whether we should threaten them for using "Wikipedia" in the
title?
Such a book could only help Wikipedia. Firefox became too concerned
with their name and it's usage, and people stopped using it (Debian) -
who does that help?
Ho hmm. To clarify, by "people stopped using it", I meant people
stopped using the name (not that people stopped using the software).
For Debian (and other hard-FLOSS projects), Firefox's policy on the
usage of their name was too non-free and it needed to be changed (to
ColdWeasel, I believe).
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)