Are you guys talking about the right to not have your page patrolled
by New Page Patrol? Because, even though I probably have it all wrong,
I don't think I've seen the word "autoreviewer" tossed about in any
other context. I was under the impression that autoreviewer status was
something where you can either nominate yourself or another person,
after said nominee has written an unusual high amount of policy-
complying articles in a row, therefore clogging up New Page Patrol--it
doesn't come to you automatically.
Emily
On May 22, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 May 2010 22:20, James Alexander
<jamesofur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure where this has come from, but there is no problem. An
edit by an autoreviewer will only be automatically flagged if the
previous version was already flagged. If it's not, then they have to
actively check a box (next to the minor edit and watch check boxes)
saying they want to flag all the pending edits, and their own (which
people should only check if they have reviewed all the pending
edits).
Ok if that's the case it makes me a bit less worried on that front
though I
am still confused. You say "autoreviewer" but a lot of others are
using
"autoconfirmed" which is obviously very different and much broader.
Is this
for those with a separate autoreview flag or are all autoconfirmed
users
getting this ability?
Autoreview is a user right held by members of the autoconfirmed user
group. Therefore, all autoconfirmeds will be autoreviewers, but you
could have autoreviewers that aren't autoconfirmed (although I don't
expect that to happen since autoconfirmed is just an easy bar to get
over).
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l