Are you guys talking about the right to not have your page patrolled by New Page Patrol? Because, even though I probably have it all wrong, I don't think I've seen the word "autoreviewer" tossed about in any other context. I was under the impression that autoreviewer status was something where you can either nominate yourself or another person, after said nominee has written an unusual high amount of policy- complying articles in a row, therefore clogging up New Page Patrol--it doesn't come to you automatically.
Emily On May 22, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 May 2010 22:20, James Alexander jamesofur@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure where this has come from, but there is no problem. An edit by an autoreviewer will only be automatically flagged if the previous version was already flagged. If it's not, then they have to actively check a box (next to the minor edit and watch check boxes) saying they want to flag all the pending edits, and their own (which people should only check if they have reviewed all the pending edits).
Ok if that's the case it makes me a bit less worried on that front though I am still confused. You say "autoreviewer" but a lot of others are using "autoconfirmed" which is obviously very different and much broader. Is this for those with a separate autoreview flag or are all autoconfirmed users getting this ability?
Autoreview is a user right held by members of the autoconfirmed user group. Therefore, all autoconfirmeds will be autoreviewers, but you could have autoreviewers that aren't autoconfirmed (although I don't expect that to happen since autoconfirmed is just an easy bar to get over).
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l