Steve Summit wrote:
Bryan Derksen wrote:
...I am a little disturbed by how much careful and detailed work went into justifying its inclusion only to be trumped with completely unsupported "the artist doesn't like it" and "the Foundation lawyer doesn't like it" assertions.
This might be a decent illustration of the unfortunate general principle that "hard work" on something does not necessarily mean that the something was the right thing to do.
It's not that it was "hard", just that it was very convincing - I still don't see what was wrong with it. So I'd like to find out where it was in error, assuming it actually was.