Steve Summit wrote:
Bryan Derksen wrote:
...I am a little disturbed by how much careful
and detailed work went
into justifying its inclusion only to be trumped with completely
unsupported "the artist doesn't like it" and "the Foundation lawyer
doesn't like it" assertions.
This might be a decent illustration of the unfortunate general
principle that "hard work" on something does not necessarily
mean that the something was the right thing to do.
It's not that it was "hard", just that it was very convincing - I still
don't see what was wrong with it. So I'd like to find out where it was
in error, assuming it actually was.