LittleDan wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
>Toby Bartels wrote:
>>Keeping in mind that many of "us"
>>will want to work on a Sifter/Edupedia project.
>... or project'''s'''.
That's fine. It's just another fork.
But we don't want a fork. In a firk, we'd have
to
rewrite (or copy) the whole encyclopedia. We don't
want to do that. We want to stay here. We just want to
make it *optional* to filter out objectionable
content.
Right, we only have to fork filtering schemes,
not the article database, which would remain together.
-- Toby