Sam Blacketer wrote:
On 4/30/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
2) Are such lookups in SSDI legitimate sourcing
for articles, or are
they original research? I incline towards the latter, since there is
a leap between getting a name and making the decision that it is the
same person that feels like more of one than we should be making
without support from a source.
I would have thought that it is original research. The SSDI is by
definition a primary source; the fact that it happens to be fairly
easily available does not make it a 'published' source. Identifying
someone in the index by reference to their name and other known facts
(eg residence and birth date) is going into the primary sources to do
your own research.
It is available on line as well as in CDs. How is that not "published"?
Put it like this - if someone in there is notable, then
their death
would have been noticed (from the SSDI at the very least) by some
proper secondary source.
Not necessarily. I'm sure that there would be no difficulty in finding
notable people who lived on 20 years or more after what made them
notable, but whose death was totally ignored.
Ec