Nicholas Knight wrote:
Rick wrote:
I'm afraid that there is going to be a lot of
edit
warring as we try to put things into categories like
"Offensive images" or "pictures of human body parts"
or "Violent imagery".
There's no reason to have the word "offensive" appear in a category at
all. Categories like "frontal nudity", "blood and gore",
"depiction of
sexual act", are all fairly neutral and should be easy to come to a
consensus on.
That's right. Note that the category system allows multiple categories
to be applied to the same content, so that filtering may be made
fine-grained, and context-sensitive, if desired. Consider the possible
treatment of medical images, for example.
-- Neil