Nicholas Knight wrote:
Rick wrote:
I'm afraid that there is going to be a lot of edit warring as we try to put things into categories like "Offensive images" or "pictures of human body parts" or "Violent imagery".
There's no reason to have the word "offensive" appear in a category at all. Categories like "frontal nudity", "blood and gore", "depiction of sexual act", are all fairly neutral and should be easy to come to a consensus on.
That's right. Note that the category system allows multiple categories to be applied to the same content, so that filtering may be made fine-grained, and context-sensitive, if desired. Consider the possible treatment of medical images, for example.
-- Neil