At 12:48 AM 8/16/03 -0700, you wrote:
Rick wrote:
Steve Vertigo
<utilitymuffinresearch(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I think we ought to list each of the recall
candidates, and invite their staffs to add to their
articles.
Crazy? :)
http://www.sfgate.com/gate/special/pages/2003/recall/
http://www.georgyforgov.com/index.htm ! ! go geeks!
I strongly disagree. How could they possibly give us NPOV articles?
The NPOV
requirement does not make them inelligible as subjets. Obviously,
if any of the 135 dodn't have a POV he or she would not be running for
office. :-) NPOV editing involves fairly representing what each of these
candidates is about. After saying this is whate the candidate stands for,
NPOV does not required that we have to dig up the opposing point of view.
Also, I suspect that a lot of them would provide NPOV autobiographical
information: "Jo Candidate was born in $city on $date, educated at
$college, and sold ice cream door-to-door before becoming a $professional."
--
Vicki Rosenzweig
vr(a)redbird.org
http://www.redbird.org