On 12/10/06, Ligulem <ligulem(a)pobox.com> wrote:
Sam Korn wrote:
Yuck yuck yuck.
I retract my previous comment. This is what comes of absurdly
complicated template syntax.
No. Just non-intuitive behaviour of subst. :-)
... allied with an absurdly complicated template syntax. :-)
Have done so. Thanks.
--
Sam