On Wed, 30 May 2007, jayjg wrote:
O.K., so now we have a third case; in the event that
someone has
posted something horrible on WR (a highly likely possibility), and
they are also running for something on Wikipedia (like adminship), you
think it would be beneficial to link to that awful post.
...
"While I can't exactly think of an example" - aye, there's the rub. It
seems to me that the times in which a link to WR would benefit
Wikipedia are extremely few at best, and involve very specific
circumstances - so specific, that they could, in fact, be enumerated
in very short list.
Here's a fourth case: the Brandt link on Wikipedia Signpost.
Here's a fifth case: links to attack sites in the talk page discussing
the attack sites policy.
The list starts to get large. Of course, the links I just described were
removed robotically by BADSITES proponents.