On Wed, 30 May 2007, jayjg wrote:
O.K., so now we have a third case; in the event that someone has posted something horrible on WR (a highly likely possibility), and they are also running for something on Wikipedia (like adminship), you think it would be beneficial to link to that awful post. ... "While I can't exactly think of an example" - aye, there's the rub. It seems to me that the times in which a link to WR would benefit Wikipedia are extremely few at best, and involve very specific circumstances - so specific, that they could, in fact, be enumerated in very short list.
Here's a fourth case: the Brandt link on Wikipedia Signpost.
Here's a fifth case: links to attack sites in the talk page discussing the attack sites policy.
The list starts to get large. Of course, the links I just described were removed robotically by BADSITES proponents.