What other word would you suggest, then? It's certainly more permissive than "shall."
k
On 3/1/06, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Katefan0 wrote:
Personally, I think it's just about right that the policy state that information without a source may be removed. (Perhaps it should be more pointed -- disputed information without a source). Didn't Jimbo say as
much
in one of his responses to Seigenthaler?
Part of the problem is with the permissive word "may", which is too often read as though it were "shall".
Ec
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l