What other word would you suggest, then? It's certainly more permissive
than "shall."
k
On 3/1/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Katefan0 wrote:
Personally, I think it's just about right that
the policy state that
information without a source may be removed. (Perhaps it should be more
pointed -- disputed information without a source). Didn't Jimbo say as
much
in one of his responses to Seigenthaler?
Part of the problem is with the permissive word "may", which is too
often read as though it were "shall".
Ec
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l