On 17/04/07, Stephen Bain
<stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The recommended sizes for articles should not be
governing our
decisions about what is the best way to present our content. We
wouldn't refrain from including a significant point of view in an
article just because the article was too long, to give an extreme
example.
No, but an article over about 30KB is damn hard to read on a screen.
The usual way this is dealt with is to split off subarticles, with a
summary para left in the main article.
Funny, I was just thinking yesterday at how much I hate that style of article.
Anthony