On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:50:35 +1030, "Alphax \(Wikipedia email\)"
<alphasigmax(a)gmail.com> wrote:
By definition, trash magazines do *not* have decent
editorial review.
True enough. Nor are they reliable sources. The point remains: trash
magazines are less common than trash blogs.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG