On 10/27/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
And you can't in my case either, because I really
do have a reason why I
think those nominations should fail to delete those articles. I don't
vote "keep" unless I mean it.
Other than you addmissions on this list (but I'm not sure if we ever
decided that stuff from the mailing list could be used as evidence
against).
Anyway, this back and forth POINTing isn't really
furthering the
discussion of AfD's problems. If you want to "get" me under some rule or
another, go ahead; I won't argue it here.
You wanted someone else removed from AFD. I can't see any way of doing
it without going through arbcom.
I have no interest in blocking you. You would hardly be the first to
vote mass keep. It doesn't appear to cause to many problems in the
long run.
Why shouldn't I vote when I've got perfectly
good reasons for casting a
vote?
It breaks the mold. It gives an example to other people to think about
AFD in a different way.
--
geni