On 10/27/05, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
And you can't in my case either, because I really do have a reason why I think those nominations should fail to delete those articles. I don't vote "keep" unless I mean it.
Other than you addmissions on this list (but I'm not sure if we ever decided that stuff from the mailing list could be used as evidence against).
Anyway, this back and forth POINTing isn't really furthering the discussion of AfD's problems. If you want to "get" me under some rule or another, go ahead; I won't argue it here.
You wanted someone else removed from AFD. I can't see any way of doing it without going through arbcom.
I have no interest in blocking you. You would hardly be the first to vote mass keep. It doesn't appear to cause to many problems in the long run.
Why shouldn't I vote when I've got perfectly good reasons for casting a vote?
It breaks the mold. It gives an example to other people to think about AFD in a different way.
-- geni