Can I have clarifications on:
1. If native English speakers is "primary" audience
while the non native speakers is "secondary", does
that mean for you that an article on the next USA
elections is OK, while an article on the next
elections of Egypt (put here any other country) are
irrelevant and of no interest to English Wikipedia's
audience?
2. Or that a terrorist attack in USA should be more
important than a terrorist attack in Nepal, if both
attacks have the same number of killed or injured
people?
Thank you,
--Optim
--- Anthere <anthere8(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Daniel Mayer a �crit:
Anthere wrote:
>If english people write only or mostly for
english
people,
>if french people write only or mostly for
french
people, if
>arab people write only or mostly for arab
people,
then we
fail.
Wikipedia fails.
OK, that has got to be the most bizarre thing I've
read in a while.
I write
for *all* English speaking people. Sorry but how
can I write for a French
audience when I don't speak French?
I am a representant of your french audience. You
could write for me.
I guess we will have both to see that we are not
writing for the same
audience. As long as you accept that some do not
recognise these notions
of *primary* and *secondary* as valid, while others
do, that is fine.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes