On 20/02/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Nobody is promoting a wholesale purge of admins.
It's entirely unclear what is being advocated. I'm seeing long
invective-filled posts that tell me to go look for examples to support
the ranters' positions myself, but no actual case examples. And let me
remind you I'm one of the ones who thinks RFA is utterly broken and we
probably need about twice as many admins.
Because of their
leadership position they should be held to a higher standard than
ordinary editors, and when applicable de-adminship should come swiftly
and in no uncertain terms. It could be appealed to Arbcom, but for any
reasonable case it should be kept off until the appeal is resolved.
Indeed. Now please give me some solid criteria, with actual case
examples where you think someone should indeed have been de-adminned
swiftly and also cases where you think they shouldn't. So we're all on
the same page here.
- d.