On 20/02/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Nobody is promoting a wholesale purge of admins.
It's entirely unclear what is being advocated. I'm seeing long invective-filled posts that tell me to go look for examples to support the ranters' positions myself, but no actual case examples. And let me remind you I'm one of the ones who thinks RFA is utterly broken and we probably need about twice as many admins.
Because of their leadership position they should be held to a higher standard than ordinary editors, and when applicable de-adminship should come swiftly and in no uncertain terms. It could be appealed to Arbcom, but for any reasonable case it should be kept off until the appeal is resolved.
Indeed. Now please give me some solid criteria, with actual case examples where you think someone should indeed have been de-adminned swiftly and also cases where you think they shouldn't. So we're all on the same page here.
- d.