On 02/08/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If she herself
is not
involved in that (and I'm led to believe that she's not) then I've got
no beef at all with her on this matter.
So when Andrew was asking her (and apparently others) to leave, and
using the word "we", he was just speaking for himself?
I believe you will find I did not say "we" when asking the involved
parties to leave, and I spoke for myself there, as can be seen by the
fact that - remarkable though it seems in this day and age - I signed
my name at the bottom. The pronoun "I" may have cropped up in that
section, too.
I said "we" earlier in the email, to describe the group of uninvolved
editors who have no stake in this debate, no understanding of its
history, but are exasperated by the vast amount of drama that always
seems to follow along when these names are mentioned, and by the fact
that this vast amount of smoke-and-mirrors about - at best -
half-a-dozen prolific editors is now threatening to define the way we
appear to the outside world. I guessed that there were others who felt
the same way - and the response demonstrated pretty clearly that there
were.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk