On 02/08/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
If she herself is not involved in that (and I'm led to believe that she's not) then I've got no beef at all with her on this matter.
So when Andrew was asking her (and apparently others) to leave, and using the word "we", he was just speaking for himself?
I believe you will find I did not say "we" when asking the involved parties to leave, and I spoke for myself there, as can be seen by the fact that - remarkable though it seems in this day and age - I signed my name at the bottom. The pronoun "I" may have cropped up in that section, too.
I said "we" earlier in the email, to describe the group of uninvolved editors who have no stake in this debate, no understanding of its history, but are exasperated by the vast amount of drama that always seems to follow along when these names are mentioned, and by the fact that this vast amount of smoke-and-mirrors about - at best - half-a-dozen prolific editors is now threatening to define the way we appear to the outside world. I guessed that there were others who felt the same way - and the response demonstrated pretty clearly that there were.