Don't you guys have ANYTHING better to do than waste time on the BJAODN?
- White Cat
On 6/10/07, David Mestel <david.mestel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
Of course, section 4 (Modifications) only applies
to modified versions of
the Document. We interpret it that its conditions apply to the original
Document as well, but such requirements are not actually required by the
GFDL.
Except that the Document is presumably modified by removing the history
section.
David
On 08/06/07, Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)att.net> wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
I would love it if those who profess to care
about pure GFDL
compliance would do something about restoring the lost edit histories
in the 2001-2002 period of a large number of entries.
I'd be very interested
in such a project, though I'm not sure that my
technical skills would be much help. If it was possible to import
histories it wouldn't be that hard to do a history merge, although
really the whole thing would make the most sense done by scripts.
What kind of entries are you referring to here? Just glancing about for
an example, I discovered that the history for [[Computer science]] on
the English Wikipedia begins with the last edit shown for it on the
nostalgia.wikipedia site, so obviously that's one type. Are there other
sources to pull missing history from, or is this what you had in mind?
--Michael Snow
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l