On 13/08/07, Marc Riddell <michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Could you be referring to David's own post of
8/3/07, subj: Moving Forward
in which he said:
"BTW, I assume some checkusers have looked over the harassing edits
(the less than innocent variety of query). If any of them would like
to but feel they shouldn't be the one to, email me or checkuser-l.
checkuser-l is for discussing results one doesn't understand or
suggesting others run a check one considers one shouldn't. Where's the
privacy violation? Please show your working when answering.
- d.