Fastfission wrote:
It seems to me that the most plausible place in which
someone could
use the GFDL in suing is if you re-used improperly re-used material.
For example: Company X downloads GFDL material from Wikipedia but does
not correctly comply with the terms of the GFDL. Company Y knows
Company X's material is GFDL and re-uses it themselves. Company X sues
Company Y; Company Y pulls out the GFDL, proves the material was
originally licensed under it, counter-sues Company X for having
claimed they had copyright control over something they they did not.
he-he-he. That seems convoluted, but not improbable. Can we expect the
average contributor to follow this when his rights are violated? What
happens if this flares up in 50 years?
Ec