On 11/15/06, Jeff Raymond <jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
Fastfission wrote:
Our fair use policy states -- correctly, I think
-- that we should not
use fair use for generic images and should remove any non-licensed
images which can be reasonably re-created as free images. The goal
behind this was to discourage unnecessary invocations of the fair use
clause, as well as to encourage free content to be created whenever
possible.
That's all well and good. But does this mean that NO images of people
who are currently alive can be used under "fair use"? After all, if
they are alive, potentially one could take a picture of them and
license it as GFDL.
I actually raised the question of this (the "realistically replaceable"
part, to paraphrase) at the talk page, and was surprised to find out that
this had nothing to do with possible legal ramifications, but rather just
to direct behavior. Obviously, available free > fair use, but I'm not
convinced such activity is in the best interests of the encyclopedia.
Fair use = better than nothing, as long as the rationales are clear and
we're not put in legal hot water.
-Jeff
--
If you can read this, I'm not at home.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Is there somewhere in the wiki where discussions about Fair Use
images' appropriateness can go? I'm having a dispute with someone
over fair use of a manufacturers' web PR photo of a relatively rare
aircraft, and I don't know how to get more wikipedia-copyright-expert
people's review of the question.
Thanks.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com