Ah, but you do, by creating and maintaining the list
of categories upon
which to block; this choice is POV. What if I'm offended by images of goats?
Are you going to categorise every image in all conceiveable ways just so
that anyone can be rendered 'happy'? Really? What about when you, I, and
everyone else committed to continuing with this have left (perhaps in a
century through death)? What about when we have 10 million image deselection
categories in all 300 languages? Who makes the judgement call that an image
is, indeed, sufficiently containing of goats soas to render it necessary to
be so-categorised?
Block-all-images is a sensible, neutral, and, most critically,
'''scalable''' system.
Yours,
--
James D. Forrester -- Wikimedia: [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
I think the number of people offended by images of goats can be seen
as a small number. The point would be that the major categories of
offensive image (porn, gore, whatever) would be drawn up. If the
image does not fit into any category then it will have to remain
uncensored (or the option of not showing any images could be used).
Yes, there will be disputes over the categories but they will be much
better handled than what's been going on at [[Clitoris]] and the like.
Policies regarding this could easily be drawn up, too.