Hi, Sorry I wrote that in a state of tiredness etc. I didn't mean to insult that article. I somehow blended the general idea of "RC should be able to tag crap articles" with this particular article.
I might have a go with this lightweight deletion process...
Steve
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/10/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see why the RC patrol should not tag it as crap, if, indeed, it was crap. I don't think Sean is disputing that his article was crap, just that he was planning on making it better. If he doesn't put an in progress tag on it (and I've never actually seen one, to be honest), then it's not unreasonable that he has to fish his half-finished crap out of the bin before he can keep turning it into a masterpiece.
Steve
Actually, it wasn't crap. Have a look at the stub that was {{afd}}'d http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cart00ney&oldid=39073156
It's tagged as a stub, it's referenced - it's far from being an FA, but it's nowhere near "crap" (not in a general Wikipedia context)