George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This dispute looks either like some combination
of original research,
disruption, or possibly active but intellectual support of holocaust
denialists.
I think its great George how you can just throw out an accusation like
"some combination of original research, disruption, or possibly active
but intellectual support of holocaust denialists" (its "deniers" by
the way) and then say well even it ifs just a a matter of "AGF."
And I think it's astonishing, Stever, that someone who is as fond
of wordplay and intellectual arguments as you seem to be could so
blatantly miss the distinction between "looks like" and "is".