On Nov 28, 2007 2:37 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/11/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the reasons for blocking someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration Committee, which she did.
Can you show that there is community consensus in support of this power grab?
First you show me that there is community consensus in support of your endless cryptic non-sequiturs.